Full-Motion vs Fixed-Base Flight Simulators
- Jan 28
- 12 min read
Updated: 1 day ago
How Do You Choose the Right Type of Flight Simulator?

Not all flight simulators are the same.
Some are fixed-base and focus on visuals and procedures, while others use six-axis motion to recreate the physical sensations of flight. This guide explains the difference so you can understand what you are actually booking and what kind of experience each simulator actually delivers.
The term “flight simulator” is used to describe everything from gaming-style setups in someone’s bedroom to full motion, training-grade simulators using advanced motion systems and real aircraft parts. Even the term “full motion” can mean very different things, from static simulators with moving seats to true full motion simulators like ours built around a six-axis motion platform.
To someone booking an experience or buying a gift, those differences are not always obvious, and the variation in price can be difficult to understand. It is easy to look at a motion simulator and wonder what justifies the higher cost.
In some cases, simulator experience providers use broad or non-specific language, which can make very different types of simulator appear more comparable than they really are. With the rise in usage of AI-generated imagery on some sim websites, it's now even harder to know what you're really getting.
Understanding what type of simulator is being offered is therefore essential when choosing an experience, particularly if realism matters to you.
This guide explains the difference between full motion and fixed-base flight simulators, along with the other types of simulator you may come across in the UK.
What Is a Full-Motion Flight Simulator?
A full motion flight simulator is designed to replicate the physical and sensory sensations of flying a real aircraft as closely as possible. Simulators of this type are used in professional pilot training because they allow crews to practise realistic aircraft handling, procedures and scenarios in a controlled environment.
Full motion simulator training forms an important part of modern airline pilot training and recurrent checking. A fixed-base simulator can still be useful and enjoyable, but it delivers a different type of experience from a full motion simulator.
A true full-motion simulator provides:
Physical movement in pitch, roll, yaw, heave, surge, and sway (6 axis)
Accurate acceleration and deceleration cues
Realistic sensations during take-off rotation, turbulence, landing flare, and braking
A cockpit layout, controls, and systems that closely mirror, or are from the real aircraft
Why Motion Makes Such a Big Difference
Six-axis motion is not just random movement. It is a precise control process that takes input from the simulator’s flight model and translates it into coordinated movement of the six actuators, allowing the platform to create combinations of:
rotation in pitch, roll and yaw
linear movement in surge, sway and heave
This is how the simulator generates believable cues for energy, attitude changes and handling. Without motion, realism becomes much more dependent on visuals alone.
When motion is applied properly, you can feel every sensation of what the aircraft is doing, not just the attitude changes you see on the instruments or outside view, but also sensations such as:
the acceleration down the runway,
the rotation at take-off,
turbulence and buffet,
sink rate and energy changes on approach,
the landing flare and touchdown feel,
braking and deceleration after touchdown.
At JetEx, we use a full motion Boeing 737-800 mounted on a six-axis motion platform and built around a real aircraft cockpit using professional-grade simulation software. It is based on the same category of simulator used in professional pilot training, adapted so members of the public can experience it safely and enjoyably.
What are Fixed-Base and Other Flight Simulators Like?
Most flight simulators in the UK fall into a few broad categories. They can all be enjoyable in their own way, but they are designed for different purposes and offer very different levels of realism.
Fixed-Base Professional Simulators
Fixed-base simulators typically feature high-quality visuals and well-replicated cockpit layouts, but the simulator itself remains physically static throughout the session.
Because there is no motion platform, sensations such as acceleration, rotation, turbulence and landing dynamics are represented visually rather than physically. This can be perfectly adequate for procedural practice or introductory experiences, but it lacks the physical cues that help define how an aircraft feels in flight.
Pros
Learning basic cockpit layout and instrument scan
Practising simple procedures and flows
A “first taste” experience where realism is not the priority
Cons
No physical cues for energy, sink rate, braking, or touchdown
Less immersive workload and “real aircraft feel”
The experience can feel like “flying on a screen” rather than in a cockpit
Partial or Replica Cockpits
These simulators often combine cockpit components from multiple sources and may visually resemble the real aircraft at first glance. However, they can rely on simplified systems modelling, limited or no control force feedback, and non-standard hardware.
As a result, aircraft behaviour and system interaction are often approximated rather than accurately reproduced. This approach prioritises appearance and accessibility over realism.
Pros
Great introduction to flying
Visually convincing
A "first-taste" experience
Cons
Controls may not behave exactly like the real aircraft
System depth may be simplified
Not a genuine representation of the aircraft type itself
Entertainment or Gaming-Style Simulators
Entertainment-focused simulators are designed primarily to be accessible, intuitive and enjoyable for a wide audience. They typically use consumer-grade hardware and software optimised for ease of use rather than maximum realism, often based on systems available for home use.
While these setups can provide a fun introduction to the concept of flight simulation for the average customer, they are not intended to replicate real-world aircraft handling, workload, or operational procedures.
Pros
Accessible for all ages
Built for fun and accessibility rather than fidelity
Cons
Simplified systems and procedures
Sometimes incorrect cockpit layout
Inaccurate flight physics
All of these simulator types can still deliver an enjoyable experience, and each has its place. They are often more accessible and lower in cost than a full motion simulator, but they offer a different level of realism and immersion.
A training-grade simulator like ours combines six-axis motion, dynamic control loading and collimated visuals into one integrated environment designed to replicate key sensations of flight. Remove any one of those elements, and the overall experience changes significantly.
How to tell what type of simulator you are actually booking?
If realism matters to you, it is worth checking exactly what type of simulator is being offered before you book.
Does the simulator physically move on a motion platform (six-axis), or is it static?
Is it based on a real aircraft cockpit or is it a replica build?
Is the session actively supervised by qualified professionals?
Do they show the exact simulator you will fly on (not stock/AI images)?
Do they explain clearly what “motion” means in their setup, or is the wording vague?
If a provider or their website cannot answer these questions plainly, that lack of transparency is a red flag. It can mean the experience on the day may not match the impression created online, or that you may not be getting the level of realism you expect.
Full-Motion vs Fixed-Base Simulators: Why it Matters

In a real aircraft, pilots do not rely on visual cues alone. The inner ear, balance system and proprioception all help interpret acceleration, attitude changes and aircraft energy. These physical sensations are an important part of situational awareness, especially during take-off and landing when energy changes quickly.
Motion is not just an added feature. It is a major part of how we perceive flight.
A full motion simulator reproduces these cues by physically moving the cockpit in response to aircraft behaviour. You feel the acceleration down the runway, the rotation at take-off, turbulence, sink rate on approach, the landing flare and deceleration after touchdown. These sensations are not just decorative. They make a major difference to how convincing and informative the simulator feels.
Where Fixed-Base Simulators Feel Different
Fixed-base simulators, even very advanced ones, do not provide physical motion cues. However realistic the visuals may be, the body is not receiving the same movement and acceleration information as it would in a full motion simulator, creating a gap between what you see and what you feel.
That disconnect shows up most clearly in the exact phases customers care about most:
Take-off: you see the aircraft accelerate, but you do not feel that acceleration pressing you back into your seat.
Approach: you see the runway and descent, but the physical cues for energy and sink rate are absent.
Landing: flare and touchdown are judged mainly visually rather than physically felt. What looks smooth on a screen can feel very different in a full motion simulator.
Braking: deceleration becomes something you mainly see rather than physically feel.
Turbulence: movement may be suggested visually or by sound, but not physically reproduced in the same way.
The result can still be fun, but it is fundamentally incomplete if realism is the objective.
This difference is one reason full motion simulators are used where physical realism matters most in professional training. Once you have experienced accurate motion cues, the absence of motion becomes much more noticeable.
Training-Grade vs Entertainment-Style Simulation
Training-grade simulators are built to replicate real-world aircraft behaviour, operating procedures, and systems accuracy to a standard suitable for professional pilot training. Every control input, system interaction, and aircraft response is modelled to behave as it would in the real aircraft, allowing crews to practise realistic scenarios, decision-making, and workload management.
Entertainment-style simulators, by contrast, are designed to be accessible and intuitive for a wide audience. They typically simplify systems, reduce procedural complexity, and prioritise entertainment and affordability over realism.
What “training-grade” feels like in practice
Even for non-pilots, training-grade fidelity adds a lot to the experience:
Switches, controls and seating feel more authentic because many components are based on, or are from, real aircraft hardware
Procedures have purpose and real-world flow because the simulator responds accurately
The aircraft motion responds consistently to configuration and energy changes
A real cockpit environment adds to the sense of occasion and immersion
Training-grade motion simulators also allow more realistic scenario-based flying, such as:
Engine-out take-offs and approaches
Abnormal situations involving unusual aircraft attitudes
Realistic autopilot behaviour with corresponding control movement
Realistic handling sensations with changes in aircraft weights, speeds, and flap configurations
Static entertainment simulators have their place. However, training-grade full motion simulation is used where a much higher level of fidelity is required. From an experience point of view, that extra realism can make the simulator feel far more immersive and convincing, but it also comes with much higher operating costs.
Why Full Motion Simulators Cost More Than Fixed-Base Simulators
There is a wide variation in pricing between flight simulator centres across the UK, and it is not always obvious why. On the surface, two simulator sessions may appear similar, but the type of simulator, the level of realism and the cost of operating it can be very different.
Full motion simulator sessions are typically more expensive because full motion simulators are far more costly to build, house, operate and maintain than static or entertainment-focused systems. They require specialist premises, substantial power infrastructure, complex safety systems and significantly more engineering support than a fixed-base setup.
A training-grade full motion simulator also relies on advanced motion systems, real aircraft components, professional simulation software, and ongoing maintenance, calibration and monitoring. Sessions are actively run and supervised rather than simply started and left unattended, which reflects both the complexity of the equipment and the expertise required to deliver the experience properly.
What you are actually paying for (when you pay more)
A higher-priced, true full-motion experience typically reflects:
Motion platform engineering/running costs (the single biggest cost driver)
Real cockpit hardware and aircraft-grade components
Professional simulation software and ongoing technical upkeep
Calibration and reliability work to keep motion and systems behaving correctly
Operational supervision (managed by pilot instructors and sim technicians) always with a second observer outside the simulator
Facility and power requirements needed to run high-end equipment safely
Lower-cost simulator experiences exist because they are fundamentally different products built for different purposes. They use less complex hardware, reduced systems modelling and have a much lower operational overhead, which allows them to be offered at a lower price point.
In this context, price is largely a reflection of realism, complexity and operating cost. Once the underlying differences are understood, the variation in price becomes much easier to understand.
Which Type of Flight Simulator is Right For You?

If you want a casual introduction to flying
If you are simply looking for a fun activity, an introduction to basic flying, or an experience that prioritises accessibility over maximum realism, a fixed-base or entertainment-focused simulator can be a perfectly enjoyable choice.
A basic simulator experience is usually a good fit if you want:
a relaxed, game-like introduction to flying
something simple and low-pressure
visuals and cockpit appearance without needing full realism
a different experience at a lower price point
If realism matters (or you’re buying for any aviation enthusiast)
If realism matters to you, or you are buying a gift for someone who genuinely cares about aviation, a full motion flight simulator is in a different category from a fixed-base setup. The difference becomes very clear once you are in the cockpit.
A full-motion simulator experience is the right fit if you want:
the physical sensation of flight (take-off, turbulence, landing flare, braking)
a cockpit that behaves like a real aircraft, not just a cockpit-shaped controller
realism in how the aircraft responds to speed, configuration, and handling inputs
an experience that feels convincing even to experienced simmers or professional pilots
If you’re buying as a gift: the simplest way to choose
Gift buyers often worry about one thing: will it actually feel special? If the person you are buying for has a real interest in aviation, the difference between full motion and fixed-base can have a big effect on whether the gift feels mildly interesting or genuinely memorable.
Experiencing a Full-Motion Simulator at JetEx
JetEx Flight Simulation is built around a full motion Boeing 737 simulator designed to give the public access to a level of realism well beyond a typical static simulator experience. Our aim is to make professional-grade style simulation more accessible while delivering an exciting and convincing flying experience.
Our simulator is a six-axis full motion Boeing 737-800 built around a real aircraft cockpit. It uses advanced motion technology, dynamic control loading and a collimated visual display system to create a highly immersive flight environment where movement, acceleration and system response feel far more convincing than in a typical fixed-base simulator.
What a JetEx Session Feels Like in Plain Terms
The difference is not down to one single feature. It comes from the combined effect of:
motion cues that make the aircraft feel alive,
visual depth that supports realistic judgement on approach and landing,
control feedback that makes flying feel physical rather than digital,
and system behaviour that mirrors how the real aircraft is operated.
Each session is professionally supervised but participant-led, with guests choosing where they fly, what they do and how involved they want the experience to be. Our team supports you throughout, whether you want a guided first-time session or a more technical, procedure-led experience.
From the moment you feel acceleration on the runway to the sensations of climb, cruise and landing, the integration of motion, visual depth and dynamic control feedback delivers a level of realism that static and entertainment-focused simulators cannot match in the same way.
In aviation terms, our simulator is designed to deliver a level of fidelity much closer to professional full-flight simulation than a typical public static simulator.
Whether you are a complete novice, a seasoned flight simulator enthusiast or a professional pilot preparing for assessments, JetEx offers an experience designed to feel far closer to real flight than a conventional entertainment simulator.
Book a Full-Motion Flight with JetEx
If you are looking for a flight simulator that reflects more of how an aircraft feels and behaves in the real world, rather than simply how it looks on a screen, a full motion simulator is the clearest choice.
You can book a session directly for yourself or purchase a gift voucher for someone else, with a range of session lengths suitable for beginners through to experienced enthusiasts. Gift vouchers are flexible, valid for three years, easy to redeem, and make a strong present for anyone with an interest in aviation.
Every JetEx session is flown on a full motion Boeing 737 simulator rather than a fixed-base replica.
All bookings are conducted in person at our Frome, Somerset facility, with sessions supervised by professional instructors and tailored to the individual.
Whether you are flying yourself or giving the experience as a gift, the process is straightforward:
Book online for yourself by selecting your preferred session length
Choose a date/time that suits you (subject to availability)
Receive Gift Vouchers immediately (and e-vouchers are delivered quickly for gifts)
Arrive, receive a briefing, and fly, with the session tailored around your preferences and experience level
If you are booking for popular dates (weekends, school holidays, seasonal gifting periods), it is worth booking ahead to secure your preferred slot.
Final Thoughts: What Matters When Choosing a Flight Simulator
Not all flight simulators are the same product, even when they use similar language online. The key differences come down to motion, systems realism and transparency about what you will actually be flying on the day.
If you want an accessible, casual introduction to flying, a basic simulator can still be enjoyable, and many can be found across the UK. But if you are booking for someone who genuinely cares about aviation, or you want something much closer to the feel of operating a real airliner, a six-axis full motion simulator is in a different category altogether.
The simplest rule is this: if a provider can’t clearly explain what their simulator is, what “motion” means in their setup, and show the actual device you’ll be flying, treat it as a red flag.
If you want to experience that difference for yourself, you can book a session or purchase a gift voucher directly through JetEx.




Comments